Voiceover Processors - Hardware vs Software Revisited -

11 October 2011
Comments: 4

Tags: , , , , ,

Voiceover Processors – Hardware vs Software Revisited

By Dan Friedman

There is a lot of talk about mic modelers in social media today. A while back, I was asked the question in regards to voiceovers, which processors (i.e.- compressors, EQ, etc.) are better: hardware or software? Well my answer to that question, also applies to mic modelers. The tools available in both formats have advantages and disadvantages. While nothing can truly substitute for the real thing, this doesn’t mean that a simulation can’t be useful, effective or even very good. Whether we are talking about microphones or other audio processors, there are hardware models that sound great and perform exceptionally well, and then there are some that do not. The same is true for software versions.

Consistency is critical in voiceover work, so a clean unprocessed signal during recording is usually ideal. As a voice talent you generally will not, or should not, be using processors when recording, and if you are it should be very minimal and the same every time. Therefore, you really don’t need a great deal of choices.

If you are a voice over talent working from your home studio, chances are that software versions will be your best or maybe your only option. Besides not really needing many choices, it just doesn’t make financial sense for someone who only does voiceover work to own a vast array of microphones, hardware or rack gear.  When considering processors, hardware boxes will take up valuable space in what are often small spaces to begin with. Another downside is that they give off a great deal of heat (especially tube gear) making tight spaces more uncomfortable.

Does hardware sound better than software? Not necessarily.  As an engineer, I would love to have full racks of hardware options at my disposal. Each helps to create different sounds, characteristics and textures within a mix. But would having racks of gear stop me from using software versions? Not likely.

Software versions of processors perform the same functions as their hardware counterparts, and like their hardware counterparts, they also have different sounds, characteristics and textures of their own. These characteristics vary from processor to processor in software versions just as they do in different brands and types of hardware. Software versions meant to emulate specific models of rack gear can come very close to capturing that hardware sound. But they will still have their own sound and character that make them different, not necessarily better or worse, than the hardware they emulate.

If it is great sound as well as a variety of sounds you are going for, then having both hardware and software is the way to go. However, if your space and budget are limited, then having a variety of software versions will probably be just fine for your needs. The bottom line is this, whether your processing options come from hardware or software, the tools are only as good and as effective as the person using them. Get the best sounding tools you can afford, learn how to use them and most importantly… use your ears.

4 responses on “Voiceover Processors – Hardware vs Software Revisited

  1. Corky says:

    As to the Mic Modelers … I can believe that a software like that could take a recording from a very good microphone and manipulate some frequencies to simulate a different mic. BUT, I see no way of recording on a mic that doesn’t CAPTURE all the frequencies to manipulate what was never recorded in the first place. So, I don’t see how that software could possibly make a crummy mic sound like a big expensive one. I DO see how it could make a great mic sound like a different great mic.

    • Dan says:

      I agree Corky, however it does ask you which mic you are starting with (Hey! There is an algorithm for that) but you still have to use your ears. Two primary things to listen for would be: 1) digital artifacts and 2) is the modeled sound truly better than the original. These are the two deciding factors on whether it is worth it or not. For VO its probably completely unnecessary.

  2. Tracy says:

    What software processors would you recommend?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you a human? * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Want to Hear Dan's Voice?

Listen to Demos